Rabbit Advocacy Animal Matters
Swiss to vote on legal aid for animals
New Swiss law enshrines rights of 'social' animals
ZURICH -- Swiss voters will have to decide whether to grant animals access to a lawyer in case of mistreatment. Supporters of the initiative have gathered 145,000 signatures, more than the minimum 100,000 needed to force a national referendum in Switzerland. The proposal calls for the appointment of a state lawyer in each of the country's 26 cantons to advocate for both domestic and farm animals. The vote will likely be held next year.
New Swiss law protects rights of 'social' animals
It is a world in which the goldfish are never lonely, the dogs are always obedient and the guinea-pigs are never tormented by children. Under a new Swiss law enshrining rights for animals, dog owners will require a qualification, anglers will take lessons in compassion and horses will go only in twos.
From guinea-pigs to budgerigars, any animal classified as a “social species” will be a victim of abuse if it does not cohabit, or at least have contact, with others of its own kind.
The new regulation stipulates that aquariums for pet fish should not be transparent on all sides and that owners must make sure that the natural cycle of day and night is maintained in terms of light. Goldfish are considered social animals, or Gruppentiere in German.
The creator of this animal Utopia is the Swiss federal parliament, the Bundesrat, which adopted a law this week extending to four legs the kind of rights usually reserved for two. The law, which comes into force from September 1, is particularly strict over dogs: prospective owners will have to pay for and complete a two-part course — a theory section on the needs and wishes of the animal, and a practice section, where students will be instructed in how to walk their dog and react to various situations that might arise during the process. The details of the courses are yet to be fixed, but they are likely to comprise about five theory lessons and at least five sessions “in the field”.
The law extends to unlikely regions of the animal kingdom. Anglers will also be required to complete a course on catching fish humanely, with the Government citing studies indicating that fish can suffer too. The regulations will affect farmers, who will no longer be allowed to tether horses, sheep and goats, nor keep pigs and cows in areas with hard floors.
The legislation even mentions the appropriate keeping of rhinoceroses, although it was not clear immediately how many, if any, were being kept as pets in Switzerland.
Animal protection groups have greeted the news enthusiastically, but critics say that it means an extra financial burden on taxpayers and animal owners, and that it will be impossible to monitor the implementation of the rules. Farmers’ associations have protested, arguing that the law will have a negative effect on the economy and decrease their competitiveness on the international market.
One tabloid newspaper has accused the Government of pandering to the needs of guinea-pigs while ignoring more important animal issues, such as its failure to enforce a ban on dangerous dogs.
But Hans Wyss, head of the Swiss Federal Veterinary Office, said: “The aim is not only to ensure treatment of animals appropriate to each species, but also to decrease the risk of attacks by dangerous dogs. Inappropriate treatment could lead to behavioural disorders.”
Doris Leuthard, the Economics Minister, assured pet owners that the authorities would not be visiting people’s homes to enforce the law — although in extreme cases officials would have the power to intervene — but would count on the results of the training and a positive response from an “informed population”.
“We do not want to create a surveillance state,” Mrs Leuthard said. She added that, in an age of consumer concern for animal welfare, farmers would benefit from the new law.
The attitude of the Government is in sharp contrast to some alleged practices in Switzerland: activists campaigning for a ban of the production and trade in cat fur products claim that tens of thousands of cats are killed each year to satisfy a growing domestic and foreign market fuelled by the belief that cat fur can alleviate the pain of rheumatism.
The cats are skinned by specialised tanneries for various products, ranging from £30 for a single fur to £200 for a cardigan and more than £800 for a large blanket — which might explain the total absence of stray cats in the country. There have also been reports coming from France about cats disappearing from areas along the Swiss border.
Should pet owners require advance guidance as to what will be expected of them, a goverment website provides it. One entry reads: “Guinea-pigs are very sensitive social animals. They are interesting to look at, but not at all appropriate to be cuddled or carried around by children.”
And a word of warning for those planning a mercy killing for their goldfish: special chemicals will be required “to put them to death”. Flushing them down the loo is no longer an option.
Pecking order around the world
— Sloths, emus, woolly lemurs and North American porcupines were removed last year from the list of animals too dangerous to be kept at home in Britain. The list dates from 1976, when Poppy Hull was attacked by a pet lion while wearing a leopard-skin print coat in Worthing
— A book by King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand about his pet dog Thongdaeng sold out within hours in 2002
— Animal lovers from the Love Kitty group were victorious last year after a stand-off with Chinese police. Four hundred cats, about to be slaughtered for fur and meat, were rescued from Tianjin market. This followed a 2006 demonstration in Beijing against a police cull of dogs
— Beijing restaurants serving dog meat – believed, among other things, to enhance sexual prowess – have been ordered to close for fear of upsetting the 200,000 Western tourists expected to arrive for the Olympic Games
— British gardeners were up in arms in 2006 when proposed changes to Britain’s animal-welfare legislation included offering slugs and snails similar legal protection to cats and dogs. The measure failed, but it did become illegal for under16s to win goldfish at fairs
Sources: Times archives
June 9, 2008 Another article on the new law from an angler magazine
Switzerland has recently passed a law with the intention of clarifying acceptable treatment of “social animals.”
The law that goes into effect September first establishes desirable treatment of animals such as dogs, fish, horses, and even rhinoceroses. An array of animals has been included under the bracket of “social animals” and a part of this new law states that any of these animals will be considered abused if they are not able to cohabit with another of their species.
Under the law dog owners must take a two part course on recognizing the needs of the dog, and properly walking a dog. Swiss fisherman will now be required to participate in a course that teaches them how to catch fish humanely.
Catch and Release fishing has been banned; instead fishers must now kill the fish immediately after being caught with “a sharp blow to the head with a blunt instrument.”
This law affects farmers as well, who are barred from restraining horses, sheep, and goats. Pigs and cows must not be forced to reside in areas with hard flooring. Although animal rights groups are jumping for joy over this new law, many Swiss farmers are complaining of the numerous extra costs it will require them to run their farms.
December 3, 2009 Europe has legally recognized animals as sentient beings according to the Lisbon Treaty, which went into effect December 1. Article 13 of the treaty states, “…the Union and the Member States shall, since animals are sentient beings, pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals…”
February 28, 2012 Animal welfare: how investors can engage on the farm
Foie gras, veal, even your run-of-the-mill broiler chickens could face trade restrictions on the grounds that the treatment of the animals to make the products violates “public morals,” observers of a precedent-setting World Trade Organization decision say.