| 
Inside a Rabbit Slaughterhouse: 
Cloverdale Rabbit Company
 Located in Hollister (San Benito County), Cloverdale Rabbit Company is the 
second largest commercial rabbit meat slaughterhouse in California. Reaching 
'slaughter age', meat rabbits are transported long distances from all areas of 
California, Oregon and Washington in overcrowded cages to Cloverdale.
 
Typically, Cloverdale processes 1,200 rabbits per week (manually killing at a 
rate of 100 rabbits per hour). According to the American Rabbit Breeders 
Association, rabbits arriving at Cloverdale usually weigh between 4.5 and 6 
pounds. At this facility, cervical dislocation is administered to meat rabbits 
prior to decapitation. However, the American Veterinary Medical Association reports that cervical dislocation is humane for rabbits weighing no more than 
2.2 pounds. Therefore, Cloverdale is not using a viable stunning method. 
 Investigative Findings at Cloverdale
 
 In 2006, East Bay Animal Advocates (EBAA) documented conditions at Cloverdale 
Rabbit Company. EBAA documented a series of animal welfare concerns (caged 
confinement; unsanitary living conditions; denial of veterinary care for sick 
rabbits) at Cloverdale:
 
 Visit One
 Under metal overhangs, the rabbits were housed in two doubled-side rows of wire 
holding cages. The stocking densities ranged from six to eleven rabbits per 
cage. Each cage was no wider than 1.5 feet. The vast majority of the cages had a 
high number of rabbits enclosed. As the stocking density increased, the rabbits 
had greater difficulty moving around. There was a strong ammonia odor from the 
rabbits’ urine and an accumulation of fecal waste below the cages. The bottoms 
of the cages were layered with cobwebs and rabbit hair. Rabbits in the cages 
were observed sneezing. The wiring of the cages was corroded. Some of the cages 
were poorly rigged—denying rabbits stable, level footing.
 
 Visit Two
 Located next to the holding enclosures, rabbits were left in the property 
truck's multi-tiered cages overnight exposed to rain. Nearly half of the cages 
on the live-haul truck were full. The rabbits were without food or water. The 
rabbits on the higher levels of the truck cages were defecating and urinating on 
the rabbits caged below. The rabbits on the truck could not moving around or lie 
comfortably. There were several loose rabbits circling the truck as well. In the 
nearby holding cages, high stocking densities of dirty holding cages were 
observed along with a pungent ammonia odor. A vast majority of the rabbits’ 
pelts were stained by urine and cage rust.
 
 Visit Three --
There were approximately ten rabbits housed in the entire holding cages area. 
The rabbits were held in several cages. Some of the rabbits were sneezing. One 
of the rabbits had several wounds on its ears and a blood-stained pelt. Another 
rabbit’s rear was caked with feces.
 
 Visit Four --
The condition of the holding cage area was identical to Visit One and Two. One 
rabbit had large abscesses on one of its hind legs and middle of its back. The 
rabbit could not use its back leg to move around.
 
 Post Investigation ---
On April 11, 2006, EBAA submitted a formal animal cruelty complaint with the San 
Benito County authorities for further investigation of Cloverdale. Now, 
Hollister Animal Services monitor Cloverdale practices on a regular basis.
  
Industry Overview
 Defined as multi-use 
animals, rabbits are raised for a wide variety of American markets, including 
pet sales, pelt trade, laboratory research, show circuits and food production. 
(1) The various rabbit sectors work in conjunction with each other. 
Today, metropolitan grocery stores and high-end restaurants are the chief 
retailers of commercial rabbit meat. (2) Rabbit meat is also sold via the 
Internet (msn.com and amazon.com).
 
 Americans consumed between 8 and 
10 million pounds of rabbit meat annually 
(3). Each year over two million rabbits are raised and slaughtered for their 
meat across the country (4).
 
 Breeding & Grow-Out Operations
 
 For breeding purposes, does (female rabbits) and bucks (male rabbits) are 
individually housed in wire cages. (5) Social deprivation is a chief welfare 
concern in breeding adult rabbits. In the meat industry, each doe delivers 5 to 
8 litters per year. (6) Typically, females rebred 14 to 28 days following the 
preceding litter. (7)
 
 The rigorous pregnancy cycle is physically taxing on the mother rabbit and her 
kits (baby rabbits). The USDA reports that “mortality when the kits are in the 
pre-weaning stage can be up to 40 percent.” (8) Baby rabbits, known as kits, are 
weaned at an early age – resulting in sickness and trauma. After 18 months, 
breeding females are culled like ‘spent’ hens in modern egg production.
 
 Pat Lamar, the President of the Professional Rabbit Meat Association, reports: “The 
rabbit meat industry operates much the same as the poultry industry 
in the classification of meats.” (9) Fryer rabbits are in high demand on the 
American market. (10) Post-weaning, kits are live to group grow-out cages until 
they reach ‘slaughter weight’. 
The living conditions of meat rabbits in the grow-out phrase are akin to the 
living conditions of chickens in battery-cage egg production. Fryers are 
group-raised in wire cages for 
their 56 - 70 day lives. (11) The natural 
lifespan of a rabbit, in contrast, is approximately ten years.
 
 The White New Zealands 
and Californians 
are the most common breeds used in the meat sector. (12) Both breeds are known 
for “fast growth and high dressing percentages.” (13) As well, these 
medium-sized breeds are more marketable to processors who can profit from the 
sale of white pelts and by-products (i.e. brain and blood serum) in the fur and 
research sectors respectively. (14)
 
 High stocking densities of cages 
are a common feature of modern rabbit meat operations. 
(15) “Controversy over the confinement rearing of social species of livestock 
(calves, poultry, swine) has been a primary welfare issue. Although little 
attention has been focused on rabbits, it is reasonable to assume that the same 
complaints of space restriction…are tenable,” researchers at 
South 
Dakota State University report. (16)
 
 “Rabbits are sensitive to the ammonia fumes created by their urine and the more 
densely packed the rabbits are, the more likely they are to develop medical 
problems related to concentration.” (17)
The Food and Agriculture Organization further determined “that 
the stress 
of 
cramped quarters…can contribute to ill health, including diarrhea and 
respiratory illnesses.” (18) Group confinement of rabbits can also frequently 
result in fur-plucking and ear-biting. (19)
 
 Live-Haul Transport
 
 Reaching market weight, meat rabbits are transported long distances via 
multi-tiered flatbed trucks. “The transport of rabbits to processing facilities 
can pose welfare questions similar to those raised for other livestock species. 
Separation, caging, crating and handling practices, mixing, food and water 
deprivation, noise, temperature, humidity, and other environmental changes are 
all variables that affect the physical and psychological welfare of animals.” 
(20)
 
 Rabbit processing plants are few and far between. “Many 
growers are forced to ‘ship’ their fryer rabbits to the nearest processing 
plant, which may be several states away.
Very 
few rabbit processors are able to hire ‘route men’ to pick up fryer rabbits, 
resulting in the rabbit meat industry being highly dependent upon volunteer 
‘Bunny Runners,’” states Lamar. (21) A ‘Bunny Runner’ is a rabbit meat producer 
who hauls the fryers of other producers to the nearest processing plant. (22)
 
 Slaughter & Inspection
 
 Known primarily as a backyard industry, American rabbit meat production is 
largely unregulated by federal authorities. 
Meat rabbits 
are not 
protected by the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act. The inspection of 
rabbits is not mandated by the Federal Meat Inspection Act or Poultry Products 
Inspection Act. (23) The regulation of meat rabbits falls within the 
jurisdiction of the Food and Drug Administration.
 
 According to USDA’s Animal Disposition Reporting System, rabbits are grouped 
with poultry for reporting purposes. (24) 
Merely 20 – 25 percent of rabbit 
slaughterhouses are inspected by the USDA. 
(25)  “Rabbit slaughter facilities come in and out of production, and since 1985 
there never been more than eight USDA-inspected facilities.” (26)
 
 Rabbits are slaughtered by 
either cervical dislocation or blunt-force to the skull. 
(27) “The preferred method is dislocation of the neck. The rabbit is held firmly 
by the rear legs and head; it is stretched full length. Then with a hard, sharp 
pull, the head is bent backward to dislocate the neck. The rabbit can also be 
struck a hard, quick blow to the skull behind the ears. A blunt stick or side of 
the hand is commonly used to incapacitate the rabbit. After dislocation or 
stunning, the rabbit is hung by one of the hind legs above the hock joint. The 
head is immediately removed to allow complete bleeding.” 
(28) At processing facilities, the optimal 
slaughter rate of rabbits is 100 per hour. (29)
 
 The American Veterinary Medical Association says cervical dislocation is a 
humane stunning/killing procedure only if a rabbit weighs less than 2.2 pounds. 
(30)  Fryer rabbits are marketed at 4 – 6 pounds; thus cervical dislocation is 
not a viable method during rabbit slaughter. (31) “In larger animals the muscles 
are much thicker, making proper cervical dislocation difficult to do correctly." 
(32) Brain electrical activity is present for 13 seconds after cervical 
dislocation is performed. (33)
 
 Lamar explains that “guidelines for the processing of rabbits intended for human 
consumption are often confusing and not well
  understood, even by the individual 
USDA and/or state facility inspectors. This unique limbo status of the rabbit 
has resulted in problems in the way of rabbit processing plants, since USDA 
inspection of rabbit meat is merely a very expensive option and without the 
government subsidization as provided for the processing of beef, pork and 
poultry.” (34) 
 
Number of Alternative Livestock and Gamebirds Processed for Meat in Ontario  
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/livestock/alternat/facts/info_processed_stat.htm 
  
	Author: Brian 
	Tapscott - Alternative Livestock Specialist/OMAFRACreation Date: 06 
	June 2003 Last Reviewed: 18 
	October 2007 
	
		| 
		In Provincial Plants 
		(P), Federal Plants (F) or Provincial & Federal Plants (P+F) except where noted
 |  |  
		| 
		Livestock Species | 
		Year |  |  
		| 
		2006 | 
		2005 | 
		2004 | 
		2003 | 
		2002 | 
		2001 | 
		2000 | 
		1999 | 
		1998 | 
		1997 |  |  
		| 
		Fallow Deer (P) | 
		302 | 
		275 | 
		330 | 
		335 | 
		683 | 
		495 | 
		358 | 
		409 | 
		399 | 
		386 |   |  
		| 
		Red Deer (P) | 
		676 | 
		939 | 
		702 | 
		756 | 
		844 | 
		517 | 
		304 | 
		214 | 
		149 | 
		134 |   |  
		| 
		Elk (P) | 
		1210 | 
		726 | 
		1762 | 
		706 | 
		336 | 
		245 | 
		189 | 
		546 | 
		28 | 
		11 |  |  
		| 
		Unspecified Deer (P+F) | 
		81 | 
		645 | 
		1,398 | 
		360 | 
		360 | 
		2121 | 
		NA | 
		1797 | 
		3197 | 
		1598 |   |  
		| 
		Total Deer & Elk (P+F) | 
		2269 | 
		2585 | 
		3,892 | 
		2157 | 
		2223 | 
		3378 | 
		851* | 
		2966 | 
		3773 | 
		2129 |   |  
		| 
		Bison (P+F) | 
		459 | 
		443 | 
		285* | 
		218* | 
		168* | 
		108* | 
		98* | 
		149 | 
		117 | 
		187 |   |  
		| 
		Llamas | 
		55 | 
		18 | 
		3 | 
		0 | 
		0 | 
		0 | 
		0 | 
		0 | 
		0 | 
		0 |   |  
		| 
		Wild Boar (P+F) | 
		206 | 
		275 | 
		401 | 
		417* | 
		358* 
		 | 
		504* 
		 | 
		458* | 
		1191 | 
		3295 | 
		988 |   |  
		| 
		Emu (F) | 
		NA | 
		NA | 
		NA | 
		NA | 
		NA | 
		NA | 
		NA | 
		362 | 
		1308 | 
		4027 |   |  
		| 
		Ostrich (F) | 
		NA | 
		NA | 
		NA | 
		NA | 
		NA | 
		NA | 
		NA | 
		0 | 
		0 | 
		151 |   |  
		| 
		Unspecified Ratites (P) | 
		320 | 
		692 | 
		1,014 | 
		1,699 | 
		1467 | 
		1925 | 
		2824 | 
		4581 | 
		5721 | 
		2547 |   |  
		| 
		Total Ratites (P+F) | 
		320 | 
		692 | 
		1,014* 
		 | 
		1,699* | 
		1467* | 
		1925* | 
		2824* | 
		4943 | 
		7029 | 
		6725 |   |  
		| 
		Rabbits (P) | 
		178,862 | 
		192,410 | 
		200,102 | 
		222,205 | 
		230,348 | 
		246,621 | 
		248,945 | 
		262,311 | 
		342,206 | 
		317,022 |   |  
		| 
		Pigeons (P) | 
		97,640 | 
		81,217 | 
		85,662 | 
		99,580 | 
		112,965 | 
		125,338 | 
		116,461 | 
		79,694 | 
		86,784 | 
		57,317 |  |  
		| 
		Quail (P) | 
		1,390,480 | 
		1,219,991 | 
		1,138,235 | 
		975,581 | 
		982,543 | 
		440,842 | 
		667,704 | 
		591,190 | 
		650,996 | 
		591,228 |   |  
		| 
		Pheasants (P) | 
		1,779 | 
		3,330 | 
		3,753 
		 | 
		3,361 | 
		3865 | 
		79,035** | 
		78,576** | 
		6986 | 
		9023 | 
		11,497 |   |  
		| 
		Partridge (P) | 
		23,173 | 
		11,068 | 
		18,237 
		 | 
		23,778 | 
		22,786 | 
		22,061 | 
		21,386 | 
		14,180 | 
		19,806 | 
		19,090 |   |  
		| 
		Guinea Fowl (P) | 
		1,647 | 
		2,161 | 
		1,397 
		 | 
		1,062 | 
		6089 | 
		3598 | 
		6750 | 
		439 | 
		2014 | 
		540 |   |  NA-not 
available*includes only the number processed in provincially inspected plants
 **includes birds from one federally inspected plant
 
Alternative Livestock on Canadian Farms - Statistics Canada, Agriculture 
Division  
	
		| 
		Table 8            
		Rabbits | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  |  
		| 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		% change 
		
		from 1981 | 
		
		% change 
		
		from 1986 | 
		
		% change 
		
		from 1991 | 
		
		% change 
		
		from 1996 | 
		
		% change 
		
		from 2001 |  
		| 
		
		  | 
		
		1981 | 
		
		1986 | 
		
		1991 | 
		
		1996 | 
		
		2001 | 
		
		2006 | 
		
		to 1986 | 
		
		to 1991 | 
		
		to 1996 | 
		
		to 2001 | 
		
		to 2006 |  
		| 
		British Columbia 
		Number of animals | 
		
		27,652 | 
		
		29,582 | 
		
		32,373 | 
		
		20,598 | 
		
		17,757 | 
		
		8,613 | 
		
		7 | 
		
		9 | 
		
		-36 | 
		
		-14 | 
		
		-51 |   |  
		| 
		Number of farms 
		reporting | 
		
		1,076 | 
		
		1,091 | 
		
		989 | 
		
		910 | 
		
		264 | 
		
		341 | 
		
		1 | 
		
		-9 | 
		
		-8 | 
		
		-71 | 
		
		29 |   |  
		| 
		
		Average number per 
		farm | 
		
		25.7 | 
		
		27.1 | 
		
		32.7 | 
		
		22.6 | 
		
		67.3 | 
		
		25.3 | 
		
		5 | 
		
		21 | 
		
		-31 | 
		
		198 | 
		
		-62 |   |  
		|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  Full table: 
 Statistics for 2008
"Rabbit Supply Canada" from Agriculture and Agri Food Canada PDF 
Rabbit Supply - Canada 
2011, Canada 2013, & on; slaughter and meat consumption stats 
Rabbit Supply - Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada Statistics 
No laws to protect Canadian 
livestock rabbits 
Livestock bylaws and rabbits, 
Surrey, BC 
Canada's red meat 
and livestock industry at a glance…2015 
Canada’s red meat 
industry includes beef and veal, pork, lamb and mutton, goat, rabbit, horse, as 
well as venison and bison. The red meat industry had annual shipments worth 
$19.4 billion in 2015.Read more from 
Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada 
Canadians Killed More Than 750 
Million Animals For Food in 2015; in 2018 over 819 
land animals slaughtered by Canadian meat industry; 2019 
previous record smashed! 
April 29, 2019
Over 819 Million Land Animals Slaughtered by Canadian Meat 
Industry in 2018
 
Canadian meat industry slaughtered a record number of animals in 
2018 
Here are the numbers broken down by sector: 
Meat chickens:
729,971,245Egg-laying 
hens and breeding chickens:
36,346,982
 Turkeys:
20,209,527
 Ducks and geese:
6,843,925
 Pigs:
21,369,399
 Adult cows (dairy and meat):
3,151,210
 Calves:
236,049
 Sheep and lambs:
522,528
 Goats:
77,942
 
TOTAL: 
818,728,807 
Bison: 9,369 (federally) 1,517 (provincially)Rabbits: 604,287
 
Source:
Canadian agri-food sector 
Canada Slaughtered 834 Million Animals in 2019 
May 13, 2020 Animal Justice 
https://www.animaljustice.ca/blog/canada-slaughtered-834-million-animals-in-2019 
The Canadian meat industry is slaughtering more animals for 
food than ever before, according to government slaughter statistics analyzed by 
Animal Justice. In 2019, over 833 million land animals were killed at the hands 
of the meat industry—up drastically from 750 million in 2015. 
Up 
from 
819 million 
in 2018, 800 
million in 
2017, 771 
million in 
2016, and 750 
million in 
2015.  
Here are the numbers broken down by sector: 
Meat chickens: 747,506,691Egg-laying hens and breeding chickens: 33,919,452
 Turkeys: 19,804,087
 Ducks and geese: 6,861,063
 Pigs: 21,404,799
 Adult cows (dairy and meat): 3,160,734
 Calves: 210,240
 Sheep and lambs: 491,146
 Deer: 9,802
 Elk: 1,754
 Wild boars: 536,238
 Bison: 9,379
 Rabbits: 6,188
 Goats: 2019 data not yet available
 
TOTAL: 833,921,583 NOTE: 
This is an incomplete picture as other animals killed by the 
meat, dairy, and egg industries outside of slaughterhouses are also not 
accounted for in this analysis, including the millions of animals who die 
prematurely of illnesses and injuries on farms or during transport, and the 
millions of animals who are so sick and injured that they are condemned when 
they arrive at slaughter. 
Horses have not been included, nor are rabbits, chicks killed 
in hatcheries, those who are live exported, and aquatic animals. Statistics for 
goats have yet to be released. 
NB: In 2018, stats show 
604,287 rabbits were slaughtered.   
Source:
Canadian agri-food sector 
Comment: 
What an abominable portrait of Canadian society. It seems that our humanity has 
ceased to exist. 
####################### 
  
June 25, 2014 
What? The Humane Slaughter Act is 
Not Being Enforced?  
Comment: 
In 1958, Congress passed 
The Humane Slaughter Act, to require animal welfare improvements in US 
slaughterhouses. However, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 
exempts poultry from its enforcement of the law, even though birds represent 
more than 8.8 billion of the 9 billion animals slaughtered annually in the 
United States. 
Because USDA refuses to protect them, most birds are subjected to abuses that 
would warrant cruelty convictions under federal law if cows or pigs were the 
victims. You 
really have to see poultry slaughter to believe it, 
but as just one example, USDA records indicate that almost a million chickens 
are boiled alive every year when they miss the neck-slicer and go, fully 
conscious, into the water bath that is used for feather removal. 
(Source: Washington Post, March 3/14)
The Act has severe limitations.  
Information on the Humane Slaughter Act (oxymoron) 
Rabbits are 
also 
exempt and unprotected 
from The Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, 
such as it is. In many states, there are no state protections for these 
intelligent, social beings, either. Animals are not resources, and have a right 
to live free of human use and oppression. Humane slaughter is an oxymoron coined 
by humans in an attempt to justify actions that are unjustifiable. 
 
5 depressing facts about Canada’s exports
 May 
11, 2015 Jason Kirby, Macleans  
It’s no secret Canada’s export picture has been grim for some time now. Earlier 
this month when trade statistics were released for the month of March, they 
showed Canada suffered from a $3-billion trade deficit—the gap between the value 
of the stuff we sell to the world, and what we buy. It was the 
widest deficit in Canadian history, and while it was overwhelmingly due to 
low oil prices, it reinforced the ongoing challenges Canada faces when it comes 
to selling its goods abroad. 
The mounting trade deficit aside, it’s in the nitty gritty 
of what we sell to the world, where it goes—and where it doesn’t—that Canada’s 
export shortfall is most glaring. Drawing on data from Industry Canada’s trade 
online 
trade statistics, here are five sad facts that 
show we have a lot of work to do. 
1.
Canada exports 
more furry animals than automobiles to China.
 
In 2014 Canada recorded 
$160.7 million in exports of “fur-bearing animal and rabbit production” to China, 
one of the fastest growing countries in the world, compared to $158.5 million 
worth in “automobile and light-duty motor vehicle manufacturing.” We’re not 
knocking rabbit farmers, but one industry employs 117,000 people, the other,
not so much.
 
Full article
http://www.macleans.ca/economy/economicanalysis/5-depressing-facts-about-canadas-exports/
 
Read more:
USDA Classifies 
Rabbits as Poultry; rabbit production in the EU; Codes needed; Australia 
Read more on our
Factory Farming &
Nature/Human Impact Pages  |